Last Sunday we had an Election Hustings at our Church. We were very grateful that all the candidates were willing to turn up (which was something the BBC didn't achieve with the party leaders . . .!).
One reason why they turned up is probably connected to the work of the Churches in the community and this was referenced by several of them. Indeed, in a manner not noticed on TV when MPs are interviewed they were almost all keen to stress some participation or support for the work of the churches.
The Bible didn't do as well.
The issue, as ever with the Bible, is the issue of authority. No candidate is overly keen to feel bound by an old set of books. Whilst the Churches represent something splendid in community voluntary work the Bible represents something like the Monarch's throne in parliament - a piece of history that represents an old, discredited authority.
The tour guide in the Palace of Westminster stands by this painting in St Stephen's Hall, the place where the Commons formerly met. She explains some of the momentous things that happened here in days gone by. She cites most approvingly the efforts - at this very spot - by which William Wilberforce led the brave and challenging political fight against slavery. She omits to mention the picture, It is of the English people reading the Bible despite persecution.
So much of what is strong about our nation is not, historically, attributable to the Church. It is attributable to the Bible. This has been recognised at coronations as on the walls of parliament. If only it were recognised in the Palace of Westminster; in this society; in the church, even.
So much of what is strong about our nation is not, historically, attributable to the Church. It is attributable to the Bible. This has been recognised at coronations as on the walls of parliament. If only it were recognised in the Palace of Westminster; in this society; in the church, even.
No comments:
Post a Comment